"Backpack Journalist" ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shaky & Blue

Well-known member
Here's a listing recently posted on TVJobs:

Backpack Journalist

WFMY News 2, the Gannett owned CBS affiliate in Greensboro, North Carolina, is looking for a “Backpack Journalist” – a reporter/photographer/editor who will produce content on air and online. As a Backpack Journalist, you’ll turn strong local stories that make a difference. You’ll use the latest technology, including lightweight next generation photography and editing equipment. Qualified applicants should have a passion for new technology, strong writing and storytelling skills and a commitment to excellence in photojournalism. We’re looking for a pioneer in next generation news gathering. A college degree in Journalism or a related field is required.
So WFMY is going in the direction of Rosenblum's video journalists, even if they are giving it their own cute little title.

Comments?
 
HMMMMMM ....

"backpack journalist" I hate to say it, but I think they could have picked a better thing to call it. That sounds like it should translate into "not a real journalist." You know, like the way "cozy cottage" translates into "house so small you'll never get all your stuff into it."

A OMB by any other name -------
 
Originally posted by queen of blue:
A OMB by any other name -------
Yeah, but I don't think this is your traditional one man band. Notice the line, "You’ll use the latest technology, including lightweight next generation photography and editing equipment." I'm betting that means Mini DV, a PD170 and a laptop with FCP. You know, where everything you "need" for the story will fit into a backpack, hence the name.
 
Ya know, this has been posted before, even probably by me, but when you become a jack-of-all-trades type journalist, you're a master of none.

What I mean by that is that it's hard to be an outstanding journalist, outstanding photojournalist, and an outstanding internet journalist, all at the same time.

That said, we, as a profession, can't just put our backs up and revolt against the coming technology. We need to find a way to embrace the technology, while also trying to get management to understand the difference from using the technology well and using the technology cheaply, if that makes sense.

[ July 15, 2004, 02:17 PM: Message edited by: photogguy ]
 
Can't wait till the next press conference when the newest "backpack journalist" asks how to white balance...should be good entertainment for us once they hire some of these.
Word is that they're looking for photogs who either wanna be reporters or who can shoot, edit and voice packages. While they're at it, they can just give them a live truck and have them set up their own live shots as well.
 
WFMY goes from dominant number one to solid number three, and now this. The tumble continues. If Lee wasn't still alive, he'd be turning in his grave.
 
Originally posted by Shaky & Blue:
You know, where everything you "need" for the story will fit into a backpack, hence the name.
Bingo.

And reading between the lines, it sounds like you should expect to be living out of that backpack, with what they'll be paying. It looks like they're looking for recent grads with no experience required.
 
Gannet continues to allow beancounters to dictate how they are going to cover news. It's great that they are investing in the latest technology but they are doing it simply to replace people in an effort to save money. Almost all of their stations are loosing viewers in mass....Can you say WUSA? They have no respect for the human element that goes into the "teamwork" of news gathering. Every Gannet station has all the latest bells and whistles as far as equipment goes. But you would never know it by watching their shows. YOU CAN HAVE ALL THE GREATEST GEAR IN THE WORLD BUT IF YOU DON'T HAVE QUALIFIED PEOPLE TO OPERATE IT....IT AIN'T WORTH A ****!!!
 
Originally posted by <Oldschool>:
YOU CAN HAVE ALL THE GREATEST GEAR IN THE WORLD BUT IF YOU DON'T HAVE QUALIFIED PEOPLE TO OPERATE IT....IT AIN'T WORTH A ****!!!
Just because you give a monkey a paintbrush, doesn't mean that he'll paint a Piccaso. :D
 
Wow - next-generation news gatherers in my very own market! I'd heard the local CBS affiliate was about to go solo of sorts. Hey, we've all heard (and a few of us have rambled) about the evolving role of the electronic news gatherer - but Jeepers - Backpack Warriors right across the street! What's next, Campfire Editors? Pup-Tent Producers? I can see the action figures now! And about those Backpacks - I'm envisioning something in a neon yellow with lots of logoes and floppy antennas, maybe a flag or two...and don't forget the satellite-dish helmet!

Okay, so it's ripe for parody. But the ugly truth is a new form of news gatherer IS on the horizon. Whether or not the term 'backpack journalist' sticks around is still unknown, but the concept of a one-person field crew is indeed here to stay. Here's why:

$$$. Cash. Legal Tender. Righteous Escudos.

Smaller cameras, laptop editors and emerging wi-fi technology may very well take the 'crew' out of "news crew". It's not our fault! Station owners and network bigwigs see the shrinking gear as the natural evolution of the electronic data hunter. Remember all the laptop vid-phone thingies the nets used during our latest foray into Iraq? YOU might remember the sub-standard grainy pictures and delayed response time, but all the guys with the checkbooks recall is the lowered cost of their sexy new video insurgents.

Now, we rightly lament the erosion of production values inherent in this winnowing process, but please don't think the chiselers care. They're too intoxicated by the state-of-the-art bells and whistles and multi-tasking possibilities to consider such esoteric matters as quality, craftsmanship and nuance. As a result, the role and image of the TV News photographer will lose focus, morphing from that of a dedicated specialist to a multi-tasking journeyman. Thus, overall aesthetics will dip. It's inevitable. Attempt enough simultaneous tasks, and some aspect has to suffer. Do not attempt to adjust your set. We are losing control of the picture....

As a matter of full disclosure, I must admit about a half dozen people kidded me about signing up for the backpack brigade. After all, I shoot, write, and edit all by lonesome as a matter of choice. Would I want to go across the street and help spearhead the latest invasion of News-onauts, be on the ground floor of that new generation? Uh...No Thanks ( and why are you asking? What do you mean log off my computer? ).

No, though I will continue to defend my right to practice ENG solo, I damn sure don't want to strap a pack to my back and wallow into the muck of general assignment. At least my bosses here seem to understand the role of a one-man-band. It's one of the more lucid observations. They realize that given enough elbow-room I can supplement their newscasts with a enlarged portion of highly-processed fluff and tragedy, all with no asssistance. Boy, do they. They think nothing of asking me to bend space and time in the process, but even they know when reinforcements are needed (as do I). It's like this: If I'm up against you and your scribbler at a band camp, an old folk's home or butterfly farm, I'll make it a point of solo-honed pride to EAT YOUR LUNCH. But change that locale to train wreck, fatal drive-by, or county commissioner meeting, and I'm calling in my logoed army. After all, a man's got to know his limitations.

So who will step up - who wants to be in the game so much they'll forgo such essentials as a technical or editorial staff? I suspect it will be the same crowd the suits have always chosen from - the young and eager. How many of us bit our lips while we signed up for less pay and more work than we knew we should, just because we wanted in? I sure did. In fact, I'll hazard a guess that WFMY (and those entities that will surely follow suit) will have no problem finding fresh young faces to go with those adorable backpacks. But they better pack a lunch. This ain't exactly Miami, but it is a very competitive market, and I know oodles of shooters on the ground who take great offense at being marginilized. Not that they would ever take it out on any of those weighed-down but bright-eyed news pioneers. Hey fella, want me to help you tune in your grey-balance transponder ?

Perhaps I'm making too much of this. Surely those in charge of such things value the contributions of all those highly-skilled yet underpaid technician-artist types. They wouldn't dare forgo the quality of the craft and go for the quick easy score. They wouldn't bamboozle some kid fresh out of J-School, strap a miniaturized TV station to his back and call him a pioneer, would they? Yeah, I guess they would. And once they get it right, it may very well become all they ever want. Like that silly rookie with the neon backpack over there said in his stand-up close, 'only time will tell'.

Back to you.

[ July 15, 2004, 07:55 PM: Message edited by: Lenslinger ]
 
Originally posted by photogguy:
...we, as a profession, can't just put our backs up and revolt against the coming technology. We need to find a way to embrace the technology,...
Hey photogguy - I know a great way to embrace this wonderful "coming" technology. How about we let the bean counters shove "it" up their asses????

But seriously photogguy, if ya want to embrace this none-sense then why don't you quit your broadcasting job and become a wedding photographer. Those togs have been embracing XL1 cameras for about 15 years now... Or you could find yourself a market 200+ community access station - with any luck you will find one that has been using XL1 cameras for the past decade.

As for me, I'm looking toward EMBRACING the new REAL BROADCAST technology, like P2 and XDcam with "MXF" transferring capability. Or maybe the new D50 beta sp with over a million pixels per CCD.

Originally posted by <Oldschool>:
Gannet... It's great that they are investing in the latest technology
What? You mean like when they replaced their $34k SX machines with entry level DVcams? Even the well respected K Fatica (who embraces new technology) has written in the NPPA magazine that most of them almost cried when the Gannett bean counters took away their SX cameras....

Originally posted by <Oldschool>:
Every Gannet station has all the latest bells and whistles as far as equipment goes
Yeah, and now they are adding home video cameras to that wonderful list. How long do you think before they replace ALL the real lens DVcams with this "new" technology???

Originally posted by <Oldschool>:
...but they are doing it simply to replace people in an effort to save money. Almost all of their stations are loosing viewers in mass.... They have no respect for the human element that goes into the "teamwork" of news gathering.
BINGO!!!! You get a point!


Originally posted by <Oldschool>:
YOU CAN HAVE ALL THE GREATEST GEAR IN THE WORLD
Well, it's back to ass laughing for me. Yeah, a prosumer wedding camera is the greatest gear in the world ha ha ha h ah ha ha ha....

You did get it in one quote
"""""but they are doing it simply to replace people in an effort to save money"""""

Yep - they learned that any wet behind the ears smhuck can point and shoot an automatic handycam all while willing to do it for minimum wage.

ENJOY WHILE YOU CAN, CAUSE SOON WITH ALL THIS SO CALLED NEW TECHNOLOGY GANNETT WON'T NEED THE KFATICAS OR THE TALENT STANDING IN FRONT OF FATICA'S CAMERA - SOON SOME NEWBIE SMUCK WILL DO ALL THE JOBS FOR $5 PER HR. ENJOY....

Meanwhile the cameramen taking their work and their """GEAR""" seriosly will probably move on to xdcam or p2 with MXF or even real HD. You can slober over H-DV meant for the home video smucks... ha ha ha :P
 
Originally posted by Ivan:
Hey photogguy - I know a great way to embrace this wonderful "coming" technology. How about we let the bean counters shove "it" up their asses????

But seriously photogguy, if ya want to embrace this none-sense then why don't you quit your broadcasting job and become a wedding photographer. Those togs have been embracing XL1 cameras for about 15 years now... Or you could find yourself a market 200+ community access station - with any luck you will find one that has been using XL1 cameras for the past decade.

You missed my point, completely. I don't like the idea of some sub-par camera being used for shooting news, nor do I enjoy hearing of some photog losing a job to some stupid ideas espoused by bean counters. And I would love to tell the bean counters to shove their ideas up their collective asses.

My point was that we need to take the coming technology, like live shots through phones and computers, (not dumb-ass crap-for-cameras) and teach the management that we can use that stuff and STILL shoot better quality video that a one-man band, all while convincing them that better quality video will, in the long run, lead to better ratings.

Yes, in my opinion, viewers at home will begin to notice the degradation in the quality of video shown if the downward spiral continues. That doesn't mean we as photogs can just ignore new devices that are going to be used in this business, whether we still have jobs or not.

(Edits for spelling and grammar.)

[ July 15, 2004, 11:14 PM: Message edited by: photogguy ]
 
Photogguy was heading towards the correct ball park with his comments. As always Ivan provided the laughs with his retort.
All we need is a mix between the two and bingo!

I remember looking at a PD100, with clam shell VTR (with LCD screen built in to the lid)& edit controller back in 1999? my comment back then was "this would make a good battlefield camera kit" something small to take on the front line shoot & cut for feeding out at a later opportunity. To me even this prosumer mix n match had a use.
The biggest danger to "quality" is bean counters pulling in kids strait from school giving them this equipment blowing smoke up their asses & telling them they are now hot-shot VJ's go get results.

I can see the results now or should that be stats? robbed, murdered, for equipment as no one was there to watch their back. Ratings falling away as job public gets totally sick of wedding video quality news storys, whip pans shakey camera, blue video.
Just think of the implementation of this equipment as the theory of evolution in practice. The weak (low rating looking to slash crew & equipment costs) going over to such things with tumbling market-share & finally bankrupcy.
Those that actually maintain crew & some form of journalistic integrity should see their market share increase.

It can be as easy as creating crap e-mail addresse's on yahoo or hotmail or the myriad of other "free" e-mail places & flooding the stations in box with mails complaining about bad footage & journalists.
Not that I would want to give any of you ideas...
 
My favorite question from other people is "Why havent you gone to the smaller cameras yet?" I'll shoot with my crappy UVB-100 til I die before I will shoot on mini-dv.
 
Okay, I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here.
Although I did not experience it first-hand, I have gotten a feel for the way things were during the years when video was replacing film for newsgathering. It seems like there are some strong parallels here. When video first hit, its quality was far inferior to film. Film cameras had gotten light and small, and the new video rigs were heavy and bulky and did not make pretty pictures. Now we are faced with a new paradigm shift. Just like the film guys, we are being handed a new type of camera and told to go shoot and like it. Now the irony is that the cameras are smaller and lighter. I KNOW you guys and gals want to carry smaller, lighter gear. It's okay, you can admit it. Do you really want to lean to the right for the rest of your life? Wouldn't you love a kit easy enough to carry in a backpack?
Furthermore, isn't it conceivable that the upsurge in demand for smaller cameras will force "broadcast quality" into a handycam-sized chassis? Every other type of electronic device has been miniaturized, why not ours? Look at the Bose Lifestyle system-a high-end stereo that takes up no space, or some of these new camcorders that fit in a shirt pocket, or a blazing-fast notebook computer that far out-performs the early room-sized computers. We can let our cameras get smaller and expect the quality to get ever-better.
It seems to me that we are approaching a major shift in our field. We can put on blinders and screech about how awful the new way is, or adapt.
Some film shooters embraced video, some didn't.
Who do you want to be?

[ July 16, 2004, 12:12 PM: Message edited by: BluesDaddy ]
 
Ivan your critism of Gannet going from SX to DV is only partly correct. Gannet went to DV so they would be able to do 4x real time when ingesting video into the NLE world. They saw the 4x real time capability as a must for their current server based work flow. A server based workflow that has all the characteristics that you like about P2 and XDcam. When I said they have all the latest and greatest gear I wasn't just talking about Camera's and photog support gear. Most of there shops have full Avid Server Solutions, brand new Sony switchers, etc.etc. I know I am going to get flamed for my next statement but here goes anyway. Ivan your critism of swithching out SX for DV is a great example of photog's failing to see the big picture and only caring about things that effect them. I would be interested to hear if Kim Fatica would like her SX camera back if it meant she couldn't do 4x realtime ingest?
 
Originally posted by <Oldschool>:
I would be interested to hear if Kim Fatica would like her SX camera back if it meant she couldn't do 4x realtime ingest?
Her??? She?????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top